Stay out of my phone!

WarrantCANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.

Yesterday in a split decision the Supreme Court of Canada made a ruling that sets a terrible precedent. Police officers may now search a person’s phone with no need for a warrant. This is a gross violation of our rights to privacy and leaves all citizens potentially exposed to abuses from law enforcement officers.

Phones today are essentially personal computers that are often packed with sensitive and personal information about their owners. This ruling indicates that some of our Supreme Court justices do not understand modern phones and view them as simply communication devices for talking and texting. Giving police the authority to search our phones without a warrant is akin to letting police search through our mail and file cabinets at home based simply on any suspicion that the officer wants to cook up to justify the search.

I understand that the majority of law enforcement officers are good people who would not abuse this authority. It has to be understood though that the majority is not good enough. That is why we have charter rights and protections from unlawful search and seizure.

Just today an article was written about a violent scumbag on the Edmonton Police Service named Mike Wasylyshen who despite a criminal assault conviction and numerous other offences just got a promotion to sergeant. Wasylyshen beat a man on crutches outside of an Edmonton bar and threatened to burn the victim’s house down with family in it. Wasylyshen tasered an unconscious 16 year old boy 8 times and then beat the boy with the taser itself knocking out one of the boy’s teeth. This lowlife cop also wilfully deceived a justice of the peace to wrongfully obtain a search warrant.

Why would an officer so clearly violent and corrupt still even be a part of the service? Oh, did I mention that Mike Wasylyshen’s father used to be the Chief of the Edmonton Police Service?

Now in light of that, would you want somebody like Wasylyshen rooting through your personal information on your phone? Do you feel comfortable that the sole discretion to choose such searches lands on the shoulders of men like  Wasylyshen? I am sure he is not the only bad cop out there and the Edmonton Police Service is not the only one that protects people like him.

Of course supplicants to big government love to say “What have you got to hide?” I will say this right now, none of your G-D damned business! I shouldn’t have to explain why I don’t want somebody to arbitrarily search through my personal files, communications and pictures.

I will indulge and lay out some scenarios anyway. Do I want a cop reading my personal communications with my wife? What if it is a small town and I have communications with my mistress? Will the cop remain discreet? What if my mistress is the cop’s wife? How bad will the beating be? What if he posts the picture of me restrained while wearing lederhosen and being pummeled with handfuls of lime jello tossed by a hired gang of circus midgets wearing assorted lingerie to my facebook profile?

OK, I am making light but my point is that the number of things that a person may keep on their phone that they may want to keep private is endless. There may be sensitive business dealings or there may be things that may be considered less than moral but perfectly legal. All of these could get a person blackmailed, bankrupted or simply humiliated if in the wrong hands.

There indeed are situations where the search of a person’s phone may be required in a criminal investigation. I contend that the need is not so pressing that it has to be done on the spot based on the arbitrary choice of a police officer though. A phone can be held and the need for a search can be demonstrated to a judge as a warrant is pursued. This oversight is important!

I have seen some people saying “Well, you should password protect your phone!”. For one thing, I expect police can find and be provided means to bypass passwords. For another thing, I simply should not have to. Sure, it is wise to password protect. If I choose not to though, it does not mean I deserve to have my privacy violated. A woman shouldn’t walk in dark alleys when wearing suggestive clothing but she still does not deserve to be raped if she makes such a poor choice.

Rights get eroded most effectively in increments. This story is sliding under the radar and people need to pay attention because our rights just got eroded by a large increment here!

The only party that has spoken up on this ruling that I can find so far is the Libertarian Party of Canada. Alas, they have no MPs at this time. Contact your MP folks and demand that this erosion of our rights be corrected as soon as possible.

You may be the next person Mike Wasylyshen pulls over when he is in a bad mood.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

9 thoughts on “Stay out of my phone!

  1. R. v. Fearon doesn’t say that an officer can search a cell phone as he or she pleases.

    First, the person has to be legitimately arrested before the person’s phone can be searched.
    Second, there has to be some evidence that the police believe that they will find from the search, and there must be some reason it must be done promptly. Here, the cops knew that there was a gun involved and they couldn’t find it – they were trying to locate the missing firearm.

  2. Pingback: Stay Out Of My Phone! - Calebs StrengthCalebs Strength

  3. I’m a law and order Conservative. I have nothing to hide. I like Harper empowering CSIS and the police to look into things without a warrant. You sound like a bleeding heart liberal all worked up about civil liberties. If you have nothing to hide then you should be fine with Harper’s laws.

    • You may have nothing to hide but not having the ability to decide who gets to see it is authoritarianism and an attack on our freedoms. It also puts the State above the individual, in other words, a complete reversal of the proper roles of citizen and State in a free society. I would have thought that a Conservative would understand that.

      The role of the State is to protect our freedoms, not diminish them. This isn’t Conservatism as I once knew it.

      • I think the Canada created by Steven Harper is wonderful. I can’t believe you are questioning his laws intended to protect us from crime. Besides this is still better than Liberals. The Liberals insist on the Charter of rights and freedoms be protected. I would rather sleep knowing that the police will look at things. I have to admit though that it bothers me that Harper let the RCMP on his watch seize thousands of guns in High River AB during the flood 2 years ago. I would have went nuts if the Libs had done it. Oh well, we’re better off with Harper. I hope he spends another $500 million in taxpayer dollars to help his re-election. He is much much better than the liberals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *